<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.2.1" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The racist gene</title>
	<link>http://www.sellingwaves.com/2005/08/06/the-racist-gene/</link>
	<description>A graduate student in mathematics and a modern languages major take on politics and culture with the following aspirational motto: ‘Deregulate your mind.’</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 04:36:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.2.1</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: DS</title>
		<link>http://www.sellingwaves.com/2005/08/06/the-racist-gene/#comment-66485</link>
		<author>DS</author>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 20:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.sellingwaves.com/2005/08/06/the-racist-gene/#comment-66485</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I suppose the now-countless examples of "miscegenation", both socially accepted an not, 
throughout human history are all merely glitches in the binary? Stop using science to justify 
acting like animals. Despite being a highly dubious notion, even if there is such a "racist/ethnic" 
tribalist gene, it is certainly is only one of many contradictory ones flowing within our coding - 
WE STILL HAVE THE WILL TO CHOOSE. I'm sure there might be a gene somewhere telling me to
konk a woman over the head and drag her back to my cave and rape her, but I've squashed it
out quite thoroughly if that's the case. Have you?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suppose the now-countless examples of &#8220;miscegenation&#8221;, both socially accepted an not, 
throughout human history are all merely glitches in the binary? Stop using science to justify 
acting like animals. Despite being a highly dubious notion, even if there is such a &#8220;racist/ethnic&#8221; 
tribalist gene, it is certainly is only one of many contradictory ones flowing within our coding - 
WE STILL HAVE THE WILL TO CHOOSE. I&#8217;m sure there might be a gene somewhere telling me to
konk a woman over the head and drag her back to my cave and rape her, but I&#8217;ve squashed it
out quite thoroughly if that&#8217;s the case. Have you?</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: selling waves &#187; Blog Archive &#187;</title>
		<link>http://www.sellingwaves.com/2005/08/06/the-racist-gene/#comment-16253</link>
		<author>selling waves &#187; Blog Archive &#187;</author>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Aug 2006 03:23:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.sellingwaves.com/2005/08/06/the-racist-gene/#comment-16253</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Almost exactly a year ago I speculated about how ethnocentrism, racism and various other kinds of local identifications in human society might be justified biologically.  Here is what I wrote then, which I mostly still agree with.  In the context of reading The Selfish Gene I would like to add one other point.  The mathematical determination of degree of genetic relatedness between individuals in a group, as described by Dawkins and presumably as enumerated by W.D. Hamilton, shows by implication the minimum number of relatives necessary to sacrifice oneself for in a genetically sustainable way.  For example, since siblings and children share half their genes with a given individual, in order for altruism towards them to be good for the continued survival of one&#8217;s genes the altruistic act has to have a benefit for at least two of them that equals or exceeds the loss incurred by the individual. [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Almost exactly a year ago I speculated about how ethnocentrism, racism and various other kinds of local identifications in human society might be justified biologically.  Here is what I wrote then, which I mostly still agree with.  In the context of reading The Selfish Gene I would like to add one other point.  The mathematical determination of degree of genetic relatedness between individuals in a group, as described by Dawkins and presumably as enumerated by W.D. Hamilton, shows by implication the minimum number of relatives necessary to sacrifice oneself for in a genetically sustainable way.  For example, since siblings and children share half their genes with a given individual, in order for altruism towards them to be good for the continued survival of one&#8217;s genes the altruistic act has to have a benefit for at least two of them that equals or exceeds the loss incurred by the individual. [&#8230;]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: selling waves  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; Free-market morals</title>
		<link>http://www.sellingwaves.com/2005/08/06/the-racist-gene/#comment-899</link>
		<author>selling waves  &#187; Blog Archive   &#187; Free-market morals</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2005 20:55:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.sellingwaves.com/2005/08/06/the-racist-gene/#comment-899</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] strange parallel between this conclusion and the mechanism of genetic kin selection that I discussed earlier, and decide that it is then merely a rationalization of the operation o [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] strange parallel between this conclusion and the mechanism of genetic kin selection that I discussed earlier, and decide that it is then merely a rationalization of the operation o [&#8230;]</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
