<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: War for Votes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sellingwaves.com/2005/07/05/war-for-votes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sellingwaves.com/2005/07/05/war-for-votes/</link>
	<description>A graduate student in mathematics and a modern languages major take on politics and culture with the following aspirational motto: â€˜Deregulate your mind.â€™</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 03 Jul 2011 09:03:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: John T. Kennedy</title>
		<link>http://www.sellingwaves.com/2005/07/05/war-for-votes/#comment-671</link>
		<dc:creator>John T. Kennedy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2005 16:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sellingwaves.com/2005/07/05/war-for-votes/#comment-671</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m not cynical.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not cynical.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shonk</title>
		<link>http://www.sellingwaves.com/2005/07/05/war-for-votes/#comment-576</link>
		<dc:creator>shonk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2005 13:57:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sellingwaves.com/2005/07/05/war-for-votes/#comment-576</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Iâ€™m not sure that â€œan international crisis in which the United States is involved in direct military activity that results in violenceâ€? is a very good definition of war in the first place, starting with the ambiguity surrounding the term â€œUnited Statesâ€? and the expression â€œmilitary activity that results in violence.â€?</i></p>

<p>I would tend to agree&#8230;which is another reason I don&#8217;t think the argument really stands up very well.</p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curt</title>
		<link>http://www.sellingwaves.com/2005/07/05/war-for-votes/#comment-569</link>
		<dc:creator>Curt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jul 2005 06:06:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sellingwaves.com/2005/07/05/war-for-votes/#comment-569</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure that â€œan international crisis in which the United States is involved in direct military activity that results in violenceâ€? is a very good definition of war in the first place, starting with the ambiguity surrounding the term &#8220;United States&#8221; and the expression &#8220;military activity that results in violence.&#8221;  Launching a few cruise missiles into Afghanistan or incinerating a large portion of Mogadishu while trying to evacuate a helicopter full of Marines might constitute acts of war, but one would have to stretch mightily to consider them by themselves wars.  Hell, by the standard of the above definition the U.S. could be said to have been at war with China when those two spy planes went down.  It seems to me at the very least that there has to be a certain massiveness of scale, and taking an all-embracing definition of war is bound to simply normalize it.  </p>]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

